All Posts By

Claire

Amber Iris Leather Review

Annick Goutal Ambre Fetiche

13th February 2016

I like Annick Goutal Ambre Fetiche, but I have to admit that the opening smells more like a byproduct of the petroleum industry than a perfume. Something plasticky and greasy in the top notes suggests Vaseline to me, or perhaps pleather. I don’t find this unpleasant, merely a little unsettling, especially when mixed with the sickly, biscuity undertone of the amber underneath.

The mental image: a prostitute at the Bunny Ranch, Nevada, at 2:30 in the afternoon, a big dollop of lubricant making a snail’s trail down the inside of her left thigh while a man in Stetsons huffs and puffs on top of her. The man’s breath smells like biscuit crumbs – he hasn’t washed his teeth. Bored, she turns her head to admire her new white pleather knee-highs, up around her ears now and close enough for inspection. Squeak-squeak goes the pleather with every thrust.

Biscuits, syrup, Vaseline, pleather. Stale cigarette smoke mingling with the powerfully sweet Victoria’s Secret Amber Romance body lotion she applied that morning.

The texture of the perfume is both dry-harsh and syrupy-sweet, resulting in an interesting pulling apart motion in the fabric, like honey rubbed against the grain of a plank of wood. The syrupy white amber is thickly poured, but clashes against the parched powder of benzoin. The resin sticks in my craw and the syrup cloys. It’s too intense, this feeling. The only other perfume that mimics this effect is Byredo’s 1996.

The discordant harmony of the birch tar, the amber, and the iris produces something of a similar push-pull feeling within me: I like it, and then I like it not. Each time I wear this fragrance, it’s like plucking out petals and never knowing whether you’re going to end up. Sometimes, I find the thought of the ride quite exciting. Sometimes, the thought of it exhausts me. Either way, like the Bunny Girl’s client, it always lasts way longer than I want it to.

Amber Floral Oriental Independent Perfumery Leather Oriental Resins Suede

Hiram Green Voyage

2nd February 2016

Hiram Green Voyage has an opening that is both strange and familiar to me. It features a sour (but also candied) citrus note dusted so thickly with the powder of a saffron-like spice that it doesn’t register as fresh or sharp the way hesperidic notes normally do. The effect is of a golden sun shining through a dust cloud of vanilla and spice, with something bright lurking underneath.

Sometimes I spray this on and I get a hint of the tannic peach skin, moss, and spices from Shangri La, and it’s like unwrapping a tiny sliver of chypre hidden in the folds of a dusty, oriental brocade. Sometimes I get no fruit, but a rubbery suede. It is murky and intimate, like the smell of a moist wrist directly under a rubber watch.

Very beautiful and very familiar. Where do I know this scent from?

Immediately, I race off through the library of smells in my brain to see if I can place it, but it remains frustratingly out of reach. I don’t think it is a perfume that I’m remembering so much as a chord in a larger orchestra of smell. Or maybe it’s the whole orchestra of a smell funneled through one chord, I don’t know.

The best I can do is say that the opening has an interesting dissonance to it that reminds of the older Guerlains – Jicky perhaps most of all, with its stomach-churning clash of cymbals between the fresh, clean lavender and the rich, civet-soaked vanilla crème. But there is also the dark rye bourbon bitterness of Mitsouko’s cooked peach skin. Voyage is much simpler and more direct than these perfumes, of course, but it shares with them the impression of a ribbon of bright gold slicing through plush velvet darkness.

The dry down only confirms the familiarity (and the appeal) of this style of retro perfumery – it is a warm, luscious vanilla-amber, heavily laced with what seems to me to be a heavy dose of heliotrope and perhaps orange blossom, although these notes are not listed. It has something of the spicy, floral vanilla feel of L’Heure Bleue, albeit less pastry-like in tone and more tending towards the more resinous, cinnamon-inflected Tolu or Peru balsams. I have to admit that I do not pick up on much of the patchouli – to my nose, if it’s there, then it is only there to add shade and earth to the vanillic dry down.

In a way, Voyage reminds me of Ciel de Gum, by Maison Francis Kurkdijan, not for any similarity in the way they smell necessarily, but for the retro manner in which they present the vanilla note – not clean or sweet, but fudgy with spice, civet and indolic flowers. There is a close, intimate feel to vanillas like this that recall human skin to skin contact. Voyage, Ciel de Gum, Opus 1144 (UNUM), and even Musc Ravaguer all hark back to that Guerlain-like clash between a bright, aromatic side (lavender, bergamot, cloves, cinnamon) and a dark, velvety side ( vanilla, musks, indolic flowers, and civet).

It’s this clash what makes Jicky, L’Heure Bleue, and Shalimar such masterpieces even today – at first so repellent and odd that wonder what kind of drugs the perfumer was taking, and then everything suddenly “works” in the perfume and you think it’s great – addicting almost. Hiram Green’s Voyage has that clash down nicely, and this is why it works. I love this perfume because it gives me a taste of what I love about the classics but in a stripped-down, more legible format that doesn’t make me feel as if I am wearing an entire history of grand perfume on my back. Which is sometimes what I want.

Green Floral Suede

Histoires de Parfums Olympia Music Hall

30th January 2016

Histoires de Parfums Olympia Music Hall is such a weird little perfume. I don’t hear much about it, so I’m guessing it’s rather a round-peg-in-a-square-hole kind of fragrance for the line – too abstract to describe in three words or less to rushed customers, but not weird enough for perfumistas to latch onto and champion as an example of the fifth art, or whatever nth art perfumery is supposed to be. I mean, it’s weird, but it’s not M/Mink weird or Humiecki & Graf weird.

They’ve changed it now, but the picture for suede on Fragrantica used to be a pile of three or four suede carpets, folded back so that you could see their rubber backing. I always found that image hilarious in its honesty. My guess is that this image was far too Proletarian for perfumers, who would far rather we imagine the suede notes in their perfumes to look like the softest grey suede cushions in an upmarket hotel on Cap d’Antibes rather than a carpet salesroom in Leeds (I imagine Roja Dove writing in anguish, “Please, mon cher monsieur Knezevic, it hurts my eyes so…..”).

Anyway, Histoires de Parfums Olympia Music Hall makes me laugh because it smells very much like the rubber backing to the suede carpets in the original Fragrantica image – and I like these little moments of intellectual honesty I glimpse in perfumes here and there. Olympia Music Hall is not afraid to call a suede carpet a suede carpet. And I’m sure that it would cause Roja Dove’s nostrils to flare.

Suede perfumes are mostly abstract affairs, for me – kind of like leather, but without the ISQ bitterness, and kind of like cashmere, but without the bonelessness. I suppose if I were to try to define the difference between leather and suede, I’d say there are rubbed out lines to suede that aren’t present in the tougher, clearer leather note. Olympia Music Hall takes the softness of suede and gives it the rubber backing of a suede carpet.

I’m sorry – I’m not adequately describing how sexy this is. I wouldn’t blame you, with all the talk of suede carpets and rubber (unless of course that does sound sexy to you). But Olympia Hall is deeply odd, and therefore strangely sexy. It’s an offbeat little mixture.

That saffron-led rubber and suede accord forms the beating heart of the fragrance, but I’ve left out the sparkling citrus notes at the top and the weird mélange of soapy, almost twee florals (peony, freesia, and lilac) which manage to massage this thing into something both abstract and likeable. Kind of like the soapy, hand wash-like peony note in Dzghonka adds to its sense of mystery rather than making it seem schoolmarmish and old-fashioned.

And there’s a hefty dose of something animalic here too – not just the skin-like suede notes, but a rather sweaty, carnal musk and a dank patchouli, all very suggestive and torrid. The base relies on an opulent frankincense that manages not to smell Church-y or smoky, but rather like the waxy, cold, and rather soapy smell of the unlit, raw resin.

If smelling like rubber, suede, snuffed-out candles, cold wax, handsoap, unlit resins, and the posy of flowers held for too long in the sweaty hands of an Austrian milkmaid sounds good to you, then give the totally odd but not objectionably weird Olympia Music Hall a fighting chance.

Books

The Only Ten Books I’ll Ever Need

18th January 2016

I got married at age 28 and had my first child at age 34. Every now and then, my mother will wonder aloud, “What the hell were you guys doing for six whole years?”

Yes, well, Mother, what we were doing, in fact, was having fun. Enjoying life and our (then) considerable disposable incomes. Drinking whole cups of coffee without having to reheat them even once. Watching 24 box sets on a loop until we had finished off a whole season in one day. Playing darts in our pajamas. Drinking shitloads of wine. Concocting and then cooking elaborate meals featuring dishes such as tarte tatin and duck confit. Oh my God, having SEX, even.

Those were the days.

Anyway, now that I have two kids and no income at all, I look back upon those halcyon days and what I actually miss the most is the reading. Because I was a reader. Back in those days, I would embark upon a theme – the Great American Novels, the Russian Masters, or German post-war daftpunkt werkit (I may have made the last one up) – put in a massive Amazon order, and then spend days and days on the couch reading them all from front to cover. I slipped under the covers with these books, luxuriated in them, losing whole nights to them, while my lovely husband (then still doting and adoring) ferried fresh coffee, pancakes, or glasses of wine to me for sustenance.

When I had my first child, the reading stopped (as did the ferrying of sweetmeats). At first, I brushed it off as temporary and congratulated myself for getting through a whole issue of Hello without nodding off. Now, though, two kids in, I have to confess that the Swiss cheese-like state of my grey matter might be permanent. I have to come to terms with the fact that I might not even read another new book ever again.

But that doesn’t mean that I am going to settle for “easy” reads, which more often than not translates to trashy or badly-written (Fifty Shades of Grey, I am looking at you). There’s a line below which I cannot go, no matter how gnat-like my current attention span is. I have my standards. Hell, I even left a breastfeeding group on Facebook because I internally combusted with rage every time someone demonstrated their mistaken belief that “your” is the declension of “you are”.

So here’s what I’ve decided. If I never read a new book again in my life, that’s ok. I give myself permission to stop feeling guilty about not reading enough new stuff. I’ve read enough books for me to be fine with reading and re-reading the books I already have and love. For the sake of round numbers, let’s go with 10. Naturally, for such a reductionist task, one must have a strict list of criteria. Here are mine. The books on this list are all:

  • So rich and packed with detail that they allow you to discover new aspects of the characters and situations every time you read them.
  • Easy to read but not intellectually weak or facile.
  • Possessed of the power to evoke strong emotions and feelings.
  • Tilting towards the fat and descriptive, rather than thin and minimalist in style, so that you feel nourished upon their consumption.

In no particular order, therefore, here are the ten books that I’d be happy to read for the rest of my life, even if I couldn’t read any others or any new books.

 

The Count of Monte Cristo by Alexandre Dumas

Count-of-Monte-Cristo-James-Caviezel-Guy-Pearce-the-count-of-monte-cristo-13255583-1200-791

I love Alexandre Dumas because he was such a total whore – he’d sit down at his typewriter and bang out 10,000 words a day because a magazine was paying him, he never read back what he wrote, cheerfully stole or “borrowed” the writings of peers and ghostwriters for his own novels, and had 40 different women on the go (true fact). His joie de vivre and appetite for life spilled out into his fat, “twisty” novels, many of which were serialized in magazines and contained cliffhangers to keep subscribers excited for the next installment. Basically, if Dumas were alive today, he’d be writing for Coronation Street, or one of those Columbian telenovelas.

Of the copious Dumas “oeuvre” (although I hesitate to call what are essentially a collection of pot boiler adventure novels by that high-fallutin’ term), the Count of Monte Cristo is by far my favorite. First it plunges you into absolute misery as you live alongside the unlucky Edmond Dantes in the Chateau D’If, wrongfully imprisoned the day of his wedding, but then it slowly unfolds a revenge plot of such devilish cleverness that you can feel your heart filling up with the savage delight of schadenfreude.  It’s basically, “Ooh, boy, are you about to pay for what you did”. It’s 1,200 pages of AWESOME.

Modern-Day Screen Equivalent: The TV series Revenge.

Read while: Wearing the fragrance Monte Cristo by Masque Fragranze, an oily, dusty animalic scent that smells like the despair and unwashed man musk in Chateau d’If, as well as the pieces of celery caught in Edmond Dante’s beard. Eating pizza topped with lard and candle tallow, apparently one of Dumas’ favorite meals. And of course, a large helping of revenge served chilled from the fridge.

 

A Rabbit Omnibus by John Updike

updike-set

It always amuses me when I see people fretting over whether Jonathan Franzen or Bret Easton Ellis are writing the Great American Novel to end all Great American Novels, because guys, sorry, but John Updike already beat you to it.

I first read this when I was 11 or 12 – the first three novels in what would much later become a tetralogy of novels (Rabbit Run, Rabbit Redux, Rabbit is Rich, and Rabbit at Rest) came bound in one volume that was, oddly, always lodged behind the pipes of our upstairs toilet. Dying for some peace in a household of rowdy Irish brothers, I would lock myself in the toilet and get lost for hours in the world of Harry ‘Rabbit’ Angstrom, whose mundane life the books followed from his late twenties to his death in his late sixties.

I learned that nothing much happened in American suburbia but that, strangely enough, the internal trials and tribulations of a weak, immoral, and often very irritating man was enough to keep me hooked. Looking back, I can see that Updike, in laying down the minutiae of one man’s unremarkable life, ended up painting a picture of the human condition. Fifty years on, this masterful pinpointing of the modern middle-class malaise is as relevant as ever.

Read while: Gazing at your own navel, gripped by an internalized sense of anxiety that is in no way supported by your comfortable middle-class life. Wearing L’Heure Bleue parfum by Guerlain, a blue-tinted exercise in melancholy. Drinking T’ga za Jug, a Barbera-like red wine from Bulgaria that translates to “Longing for the south”.

 

Winds of War and War & Remembrance by Hermann Wouk

ve-day-germany-surrender-ww2

I worked for a huge Jewish charitable organization (World ORT) in Montenegro for many years, and one summer, a young intern by the name of Rebekkah came out to us to gain a bit of work experience. More valley girl than Jewish princess, her father feared her becoming less and less Jewish in outlook, so halfway through her term, he sent her a care box containing, amongst other things, these two massive novels. She took one look at them, laughed, and promptly dumped them into my lap. I started reading that night, and I don’t think I was able to sleep until I had devoured both volumes.

The two books, taken together, span the entirety of World War 2 as seen through the eyes and experiences of the sprawling Henry clan, which itself revolves around the naval officer Victor “Pug” Henry. Modest and capable, Pug becomes the trusted emissary of President Roosevelt, so he is thrust into the nerve center of the war, and thus we gain a bird’s eye view of the most crucial historical events such as Yalta, the Pearl Harbor bombings, and backroom dealings with Hitler. His children and their spouses get caught up in the war, with some of them ending up in concentration camps or major battles, whose descriptions go on for 1,000 pages at a time but hold you utterly rapt.

I read these books at least once a year, and they never fail to teach me something important about the war, about honor, and duty, and yes, the human condition – but they entertain me at the same time. It’s like the trashiest Jackie Collins multi-generational saga grafted onto a history book. It is purely down to this novel that I understand what went on in WWII – sorry school.

Modern-Day Screen Equivalent: Well, it’s not modern, but they did actually make a TV mini-series out of this in 1983, starring Robert Mitchum and Ali McGraw.

Read while: Wearing Joy by Jean Patou – the pure perfume, obviously – to match the gilded, hopeful optimism of soldiers going off to war in the early years. Once you get into the second book and all hope is lost, you should dab on a bit of Guerlain’s Mitsouko, its peach, spices, and moss heralding a new, brisk outlook on the world, when all illusions have been dropped.

 

The Idiot by Fyodor Dostoevsky

17569098._SX540_

Forget everything you think you know about Russian novels – that they’re too long, the names are too long, and they are hard to read, and so on. In fact, once you get into them, you’ll see that the great novels of Russian literature are the juiciest page-turners of all time, rife with intrigue, sadness, fun, betrayal, love, sex, war, and basically, all the good stuff. I toyed with putting Anna Karenina in this spot, for example – it’s just a cracking good read, and far better than War and Peace – but I had a deeper emotional reaction to the Idiot, so here it is.

The novel is based on the story of Prince Lyov Nikolaevich Myshkin who is so good and open-hearted that everyone who meets him thinks he is an idiot. Idiot as in the “he’s two cards short of a full deck” kind of way, not the modern-day, “will you look at that gobshite over there?” sense of the word. Dostoevsky sets Myshkin up as a Christ figure but doesn’t give him any divine powers, as a sort of experiment to see how a good, beautiful, Christ-like man would survive in our artificial and mendacious world today.

As you can imagine, we royally fuck it up.

I love this novel because it bitchslaps me in my moral center. Its message is so excoriating that I am surprised the book doesn’t burn through my hands every time I read it. Dostoevsky sets out “to depict a completely beautiful human being” and then allows modern society to tear him apart like a pack of wolves. Something about that is compelling, like rubbernecking at a car accident site.

Read while: Eating caviar and sour cream on blinis. Wearing Ambre Russe by Parfum d’Empire, a leathery amber perfume so soaked in vodka and champagne, your family will start hiding the booze from you.

 

Gone with the Wind by Margaret Mitchell

tumblr_inline_mzkafwsRN01r4j8j1

The movie is excellent but the book is miles better. Forget the Scarlett O’Hara you think you know and love from the silver screen – this Scarlett is much tougher and more complex. The terrifying social fall of the O’Hara’s against the backdrop of the war in the south and Sherman’s March to the Sea is depicted with such texture in the book that Scarlett’s grasping at survival at all costs makes more sense. In the movie, at times, she just seems like a pretty girl being given her comeuppance, but in the book, it is easier to admire the true grit that emerges in her because we are able to see exactly how sharp the rock is that’s being pressed down on her white little neck.

The sheer range of the historical and social research that went into the novel doesn’t quite translate to the screen, and so provides only a 2D setting against which the character of Scarlett unfolds, thus compressing her into a series of “moments” that only tell part of the story – those flashing green eyes, the dress made out of curtains, being cruel to Mellie. In the novel, the background and the other characters frame Scarlett like a black velvet cloth cupping a diamond, lovingly revealing her every angle and flaw, so that we may see her clearly. She may still be unlikeable, but by God, we can see every bit of her.  

Margaret Mitchell said that the main theme of Gone with the Wind is survival. “What makes some people come through catastrophes and others, apparently just as able, strong, and brave, go under? It happens in every upheaval. Some people survive; others don’t”, she said. The ones that survived had what was called “gumption” back then – and Scarlett had gumption in spades.

Read while: Drinking bathtub gin (whatever that may be). Wearing a swathe of green curtains wrapped around your body. Dripping wet in Iris Silver Mist by Serge Lutens because it smells like the wet carrots Scarlett wrenched from the cold, red soil of Tara in her most desperate moment (“As God is my witness; I will never go hungry again”).

 

The Golden Bowl by Henry James

vincent-van-gogh-a-couple-walking-in-the-forest

The Golden Bowl is the last novel Henry James ever completed, and as per his later work, it is complex and impressionistic rather than realistic (= “easy to read”), so a part of me quakes at putting this on the list. To read it, I have to relax my mind’s eye like I do when looking at one of those “magic eye” paintings, and if I succeed in letting go, all the detail of the novel rises up to meet me, like running my fingers across a sheet of Braille and eventually finding the pattern that unlocks the message.

It tells the story of two couples – Maggie and her rich American father, Adam, who are married to the impoverished Prince Amerigo and the feckless (as in “All my fecks have been given out – I have not a single one left to give”) Charlotte Stant respectively. Charlotte and Amerigo used to be lovers, and Charlotte is Maggie’s best friend from school, so things are….complicated. The symbol of the story, and the object around which it revolves, is the gift of a golden bowl picked out one day as a gift by Charlotte and given to her husband, Adam. The golden bowl is beautiful on the outside but there is a tiny, almost invisible flaw in it that symbolizes the tiny crack that appears between the happy couples in the form of an affair.

The whole thing takes place in a series of internal monologues and tortured conversations between the protagonists where nothing is said and everything is implied. At first, it’s enough to drive anyone mad, but relax into it, and you will see that the story actually moves forward and takes shape even though you think absolutely nothing is happening, and then, before you know it, you are both caught up and deeply moved. It’s an immersive experience – you see nothing on the surface, and then you dive down, and you are in the subcutaneous layer where the heart and the other organs are writhing.

They tried to make a film out of this, starring Uma Thurman, but this was always going to be an impossible book to translate onto the screen. I saw the trailer and it was basically two people walking around a garden. Yep. That’s what the novel looks like from the outside too.

Read while: Wearing Chanel’s 31 Rue Cambon, a modern chypre fragrance with a dark, almost animalic labdanum dry down that its sparkling bergamot and iris topnotes belie. Like the novel, this scent has hidden depths and flurries, sucking down notes and then spitting them back up again on your skin later, just when you think the show is over. Eating rolos, because like the Golden Bowl they are utterly perfect to the eye (and in the mouth) but contain a fatal flaw – you always have to give your last one away.

 

We Need to Talk About Kevin by Lionel Shriver

we-need-to-talk-about-kevin

Chilling. The first time I read it, I wasn’t a mother and I didn’t see the ending coming, so it laid me flat. For about a week afterwards, I could barely function, so utterly devastated was I. Everybody knows the story by now – it’s about a boy called Kevin who went on to organize and carry out a school massacre. Narrated by his mother, the story asks whether monsters like Kevin are born or made. Interestingly enough, my opinion on this (and on the reliability of the narrator) changes each time I read it, which is surely the hallmark of a great writer. Rich with psychological detail and irresistible “what-ifs”, it is a novel I come back to again and again.

I also like that Lionel Shriver wrote this as a sort of test to herself on whether she should have children or not – she ultimately decided not – because it shows that women writers can be just as brave, honest, and ruthless with their literary exploration as men.

Read while: Peeing on a stick and waiting for a little blue line to appear, wondering if you are gestating your own little Kevin inside of you right now. Wearing Like This by Etat Libre d’Orange, a perfume made for Tilda Swinton, who played Kevin’s mother in the (atrocious) movie adaptation. The fragrance itself is the opposite of dark and challenging – it’s an ode to the odors of the home kitchen, with ginger, pumpkin pie, and Scotch. But with a book this dark, you need a bit of comfort and things don’t get much more comforting than Like This.

 

Riders by Jilly Cooper

rexfeatures_669876_3222839c

Rubert Campell-Black, oh my! Riders did more for my sex education than any awkward book my mum ever bought me. A massive romp through the glamorous, bed-hopping world of show jumpers in the Cotswolds, Riders is about the rivalry between the dashing, womanizing Campell-Black and the dark, gypsy-like Jake Lowell (“under whose magic hands even the most difficult horse or woman is charmed”- SCREAMING) as they compete their way to the Olympics. Enormously trashy and brilliantly written, this is still a pleasure to read, although all the references to “dripping wet bushes” may be lost on a whole generation who grew up whipping off every pubic hair as it emerged.

Read while: Wearing Arabian Horse by Parfumerie Generale, which quite literally smells like the sweaty mane of a horse, or Chanel Cuir de Russie, which smells like you just rolled off a horse and into a ballgown without so much as a whore’s bath, as they claim Camilla Parker-Bowles used to do.

 

A Farewell to Arms by Ernest Hemingway

A-Farewell-to-Arms-014_600x360

Believe it or not but I once was part of a team that organized a countrywide effort to collect illegal weapons and handguns* from citizens in Montenegro. The campaign was called “A Farewell to Arms” because I am nothing if not irritatingly literal-minded. Feeling like I should at least familiarize myself with the book that had lent its name to the campaign, I ordered it on Amazon.

It’s about the life of American Frederic Henry who’s serving in the ambulance corps in North-West Italy during World War I, and is written in the terse style of Hemingway, who obviously believed that there was a tax on adjectives and who probably would have done away with the indefinite article if allowed free reign. Although I’m not a big fan of this type of butch, muscular writing, I admit that this is a story that needs to be told with a stiff upper lip.

The ending is so bleak that I always feel like throwing the book at someone when I’m done. And when I was watching the Silver Linings Playbook (the movie) and a character who’s reading it actually does throw the book out the window, I felt a thrill of recognition – yeah, this book is poison. But I read it over and over again, and it’s like picking at a scab – I have a weird compulsion to do it.

*Originally we thought we’d just be collecting the various handguns that the State had distributed to citizens during the last war for, er, self-defense, but we ended up collecting a fair number of rocket launchers and ground-to-air missile launchers too. Oh, and a worrying amount of unexploded ordinances and hand grenades, some of them stacked five deep under grandma’s bed. Lovely.

Read while: Drinking a metal cup of “rusty wine” (open a bottle of wine and let is slowly oxidize in a hot kitchen for four days before consuming) in sympathy with the rotten-tasting wine our hero Henry and his mates have to drink on the frontlines. Playing Paint it Black by the Rolling Stones on a loop. Wearing Black Aoud by Montale and generally reeking of iodine, bandaids, and bitter despair.

 

Beach Music by Pat Conroy

plantation

Confession time: the more I re-read this novel, the more overblown and ridiculous it appears to me. But despite my misgivings, it still gives me plenty of meat to chow down on every time I turn to it, covering as it does a multi-generational themes such as holocaust survival, suicide, family trauma, the universal problem of mothers, and the in-jokes, petty grievances, and watertight loyalty that binds families together even in their worst moments. Flitting between Rome, Italy, and Charleston, South Carolina, the story follows Jack McCall and his attempts to escape his gothic southern past and his wife’s recent suicide.

When I read this book, my nose runs, I howl with laughter, I curse, I cry great big wracking sobs that make my ribs ache….great literature this might not be, but it sure gets my engine running, every time. Of course, the love with which Pat Conroy paints his beautiful south makes it one of the main characters in the book – and it’s for this reason that I’ve always longed to visit South Carolina and the Low Country. I’ve read everything he’s written, but this is the one that totally gets me.

Read while: Eating shrimp and grits on your lap, to be followed by a pot of crawdaddies, allowing butter to run down your face and arms onto the pages of the book. Drinking a glass of sour mash bourbon or better yet, moonshine your daddy brewed in the backyard last summer. I honestly don’t know what any of this stuff is, but Pat Conroy makes it all sound so good. Wearing Kiste by Slumberhouse, a boozy bourbon and peach perfume with strong undercurrent of southern tobacco leaves and iced tea.

Iris Leather Suede

Serge Lutens Daim Blond

17th January 2016

Serge Lutens Daim Blond is a simple pleasure done right. It is a dry, dusty suede lightly decorated with the scent of apricots – not the juicy, sweet flesh of ripe apricots but the desiccated husk of skin when shriveled up to almost nothing. Iris provides the bitter, gray powder, and osmanthus the delicate tannin of apricots and black tea.

It is not in the least bit animalic but there is a lightly musky undertone that conjures up a ghostly image of female skin. When I wear Daim Blond, I imagine Newland Archer peeling back the fine-grained Italian leather glove from Countess Olenska’s wrist and pressing his mouth to her quivering flesh. She’s on the cusp of allowing herself to be ruined. It’s a moment of sensuality written on a such a tiny scale so as not to register to anyone but them, but somehow the restrained, pulled-in nature of the moment and its capacity to unleash the hounds of hell is far sexier than anything more explicit.

Daim Blond smells like a woman’s wrist and the tipping point of desire.

Suede

La Parfumerie Moderne Cuir X

12th January 2016

I have a hankering for La Parfumerie Moderne Cuir X that I just can’t shake. I’m on my third sample of it and the crush is still going strong. But like any crush, ask me to explain it and I can’t.

I mean, if pushed, I’d say it’s a beautiful modulated suede, its hints of rubbery saffraleine perfectly matched by a hint of smoke and a smooth, almost edible note that lands halfway between violet and plum, even though there’s no flowers or fruit in it. It has a modernist structure to it, meaning that it’s been streamlined to survive in space, free of any weighty flowers, powder, amber or resins. If I were to visualize it as a person, it would be Michael Fassbender’s character in Prometheus, David, a sleek android with a ferocious intellect and a perfectly smooth, whip-thin physique. Like David, Cuir X is a dove grey suede glove fitted tightly onto an industrial bone structure.

It’s probably nothing new under the sun. People seem divided into two camps – the “Meh, this is nothing special” camp and the “This is pretty damn special” camp, and neither seem able to articulate their reasons that well. But desire is irrational. I can only tell you that Cuir X wears like a slick of smoked single cream on my skin. It’s sexy. I want to eat myself when I’m wearing it.

But it costs €160. And for that type of investment, it had better be a long-term thing and not just a crush. I wouldn’t buy a horse or marry a man without first looking at his teeth, lifting his forelocks, and doing a thorough inspection of his undercarriage, so I’m going to do the same due diligence with Cuir X.

I mean, who’s to say that my desire for Cuir X isn’t just a flash in the pan? After all, I own many suede or “fine cuir” fragrances and at some point or another, I thought that I couldn’t live without them either. I don’t want to engage in anymore suede bed-hopping. I want a long-term commitment.

So. I’m going to test and re-test all the suede perfumes I own or once tested and wrote off, and if I still love Cuir X above all the others, I will buy it. That is a promise to myself. First of my list is a re-test of Parfum d’Empire’s Cuir Ottoman by the same perfumer (Marc-Antoine Corticchiato) – I had originally written it off, but if so many people say that Cuir X is basically a modernized snippet of Cuir Ottoman, then I owe it to myself and my wallet to give it another try (seeing as it’s about €40 cheaper).

A friend said that it is 96.5% similar to Cuir de Lancome at the top (which, honestly, it is) but then diverges towards the heart. I can confirm this – despite a similar top note, Cuir de Lancome is more floral and has a soft powder to it that Cuir X does not. But there are other suede perfumes. And lots of time. I have patience and an Excel spreadsheet.

Crushes are unreliable and desire can ebb away as quickly as it comes. Let’s see which way this goes.

Oud Rose Saffron

By Kilian Rose Oud

10th January 2016

Rose, oud, saffron, gaiac wood, cardamom……yes, it’s the typical line-up for your average rose-oud fragrance. I’ll excuse you if you’re not getting too excited – I know I wasn’t. But I find myself haunted by my sample of By Kilian Rose Oud, long after it’s gone, and I’ll tell you why. It’s one of the easiest rose-oud fragrances to wear, as well as the most serenely beautiful. It has none of the exciting harshness of the oud accord used in most other Western oud fragrances, and is all the better for it. Think of the most beautiful supermodel you’ve ever laid eyes on – but one who nonetheless fails to either move you or turn you on – and that’s Rose Oud by Kilian.

The secret to the success of Rose Oud is this: all the major elements (the rose, the oud, the gaiac wood, and the saffron) do not possess a strong character of their own but instead melt together to form a small black velvet pocket into which you find your hand fits perfectly.

So the green, slightly sour wet rose at the start gains a dulcet depth from the subtle oud, growing sweeter, jammier, and fuller as time goes on. The oud provides the dark backdrop without muscling its way into the composition in that bullying way oud tends to have. The saffron casts only a fine patina of sweet gold dust rather than its usual iodine-y leather scream. It’s a very subtle, smooth fragrance  – almost ephemeral. When I think the show has ended, eight hours on, I am surprised to find that golden, almost pudding-like saffron emerge on my skin, and a pleasantly sour tinge of oud.

Calice Becker knows her roses. Boy, she knows her roses, and Rose Oud is a rose done right. The eventual jamminess and “wetness” of the rose here mimics the pulpy lushness of the flower at the start of Liaisons Dangereuses (also by Calice Becker), but without that peach shampoo thing that Liaisons Dangereuses slithers into towards the end.

The oud, by the way, is synthetic but has the virtue of not smelling like it, so carefully woven into the fabric of the fragrance has it been. Yet more proof that it is more the skill of the perfumer (and to be fair, the art direction, for which we can thank Kilian Hennessey himself) than the raw materials that matters in terms of the final result.

Rose Oud is a beautiful, delicate piece of work whose subtleties could easily go unnoticed if you weren’t paying attention. It is by far one of my favorite rose-oud fragrances, and despite the cost, I have a feeling that I will own a (refill) bottle of this someday, even if I have to sell off some of my (many) other oud fragrances to afford it. I have finally reached the stage where I am content to do away with five or six inferior bottles of perfume to get my hands on just one bottle of something that satisfies and pleases from every angle.

Rose Oud may not be the most exciting or unusual rose oud on the market – many think it is pretty but mundane – but I think it’s one of the best-smelling rose-ouds around, perhaps only bettered by Tom Ford’s wonderful Noir de Noir or Guerlain’s Rose Nacree du Desert.

Green Floral Hay Herbal Immortelle Independent Perfumery Iris Suede Summer

The Perfumes of Anatole Lebreton

31st December 2015

Recently I had the great experience of testing all four perfumes in the sample kit offered by Anatole Lebreton. You can order the sample set here for €6.50 delivered within Europe (which is a great deal!). Here are my thoughts:

Bois Lumiere

Bois Lumiere begins with a green, slightly wet honey – a bit dirty, as if it’s just passed from the arse-end of a bee onto your skin. But that slightly awkward phase passes quickly, transitioning smoothly into a soft, dry haze of a scent – a sort of paean to lazy summer days spent lying amongst the tall meadow grasses, making daisy chains with your children. Tender and melancholic, Bois Lumiere pairs a sour-ish honey with sun-bleached woods and a dry immortelle note that smells more like dried hay than the usual maple syrup. What is interesting is that these slightly green-gold hay notes get submerged into a thick pool of beeswax, the whole scent turning on a dime from dry grass one moment to molten wax the next.

The notes make it sound like it’s heavy – but it’s not. It’s a luminous, almost transparent wear, with a scent close to the feel and smell of the steam coming off a cup of chamomile tea. In fact, when I sniffed this blind, I thought the immortelle was actually chamomile – there is a dried hay aroma to both. There is a charming rustic feel to Bois Lumiere, a sort of idealized picture of a day out in the country. I find this to be a characteristic of the four Anatole Lebreton perfumes I’ve tested – they all paint a very specific landscape or scene, using childlike brush strokes in the faux-naïve style to bring out primitive emotions and memories in the wearer. They’re real heart-tuggers, these perfumes.

Since it is a honey scent, is it animalistic? Well, yes, but only in the sense that the honey we eat at breakfast still has the heavy scent of the bee about it. Bois Lumiere is suggestive in the same way as the rose-honey-wax notes in Cologne Pour Le Soir are: not smelling of either urine or sex, but of the sweet and sour aroma of silk stockings slowly peeled from heated flesh, complete with the enticing scent of clean female fur at the end of a long day. That Bois Lumiere ends up in the same flurry of the warm vanillic resin of benzoin is another line drawn to the wonderful Cologne Pour Le Soir. Is there room for another slightly sour, slightly animalic honey-beeswax-benzoin perfume in my life? Maybe, just maybe…..

L’Eau de Merzhin

L’Eau de Merzhin is the standout of the Lebreton line, in my opinion. The opening has all the dewy, wet, greenness of real-life plants and grasses, as well as the unpretentious cheerfulness of meadow flowers like daffodils, mimosa, and wood violets. It is an opening thick with pollen and crawling with life.

It also strikes me that this could be the inverse of Bois Lumiere, in that L’Eau de Merzhin starts off in the damp undergrowth of a meadow at dawn and Bois Lumiere is the same meadow at high noon, complete with the honeyed smell of sun-baked hay. The opening is almost hallucinogenic in its dripping-wet, juicy ripeness, and I’m reminded of the breath-taking beauty of other famous floral openings, such as De Profundis and Ostara. Despite myself, I am moved, oh, I am moved! I am such a sap for openings like this.

L’Eau de Merzhin loses most of this stemmy verdancy when it transitions into the heart, which seems (to me) to share a common accord with Bois Lumiere, specifically that steamy chamomile tea or sun-baked hay aspect. But where the hay in Bois Lumiere is wrapped up in a sweet, molten beeswax and syrupy, grassy immortelle, giving it a sort of golden, lazy afternoon sort of atmosphere, the hay or chamomile tea aspect here is greener and more herbal. I sense the juicy, snapped-stalk touch of angelica here. Heading off into the drydown, the galbanum adds its pine-like coolness, as well as a touch of lime peel.

It’s great. Something about the midsection gives me pause for thought, though, as it reminds me strongly of the mossy, slightly soapy neroli-inflected musk in the dry down of Acqua di Parma’s Colonia Assoluta, even though there don’t seem to be any notes connecting the two. Perhaps there is some unlisted white musk in this, or even some neroli, who knows? Anyway, the mind association, however tenuously or incorrectly made, happens to be a pleasant one, as I’ve owned and loved Colonia Assoluta in the past. I would actually consider getting a bottle of L’Eau de Merzhin in the summer as a replacement for my Assoluta – I think it would work brilliantly, me horsing around with the kids on the beach, and smelling like salty hay, wet green grasses, and moss.

Despite what I’ve said about the greenness of this fragrance, though, the prevailing feel in the dry down is that of a sweet, grassy creaminess – there’s no sharp green sting in the tail here, just an utterly comfortable wear that happens to evoke a dew-wet meadow and the shadows of a forest edging it.

Incarnata

Incarnata is supposed to evoke the scent of a vintage lipstick, and for a few moments it does, with the quasi-stale mien of cosmetic wax created by that clash of sweet violet (or rose) and stern, grey orris root we’ve seen before in every cosmetic scent from Misia to Lipstick Rose. The only difference is that Incarnata ramps this lipstick accord to the nth degree, and it’s rather fun feeling like you’re being pressed up against a wall by a giant tube seething with violet ionones and iris rhizomes. It’s a lipstick on steroids, yo.

The heart is something I’m not so keen on. If this lipstick was a person, the middle section would be that awkward teen phase, complete with angry outbursts and the occasional bout of violence. Basically, Incarnata sidesteps the pillow-soft landing normally used in lipstick scents and instead pairs a rather black, aggressive myrrh with a sharp raspberry leaf note and a green-ish amber, fusing them into a sharp, almost mint-like green resinousness that slices through the cloud of lipstick prettiness like a shark fin.

The resin adds vigour and backbone to what might otherwise be (eventually) a very bland cosmetics accord. It’s bright and fresh, which is not something you can normally say about myrrh or amber. But on the other hand, the slight mint and vetiver undertones are simply unpleasant to my nose – there is something too jutting about the combination. I am left feeling like I am wearing a smear of old lipstick, cut with the brackish, stale vase water from a bunch of mint that someone left out on the kitchen windowsill for too long. I feel a bit cheated – I came into this expecting lipstick and a bed stuffed with rose petals and white musk with which to break my fall, but instead I’ve cut my foot on a broken bottle.

The drydown is a return to the lipsticky waxiness of the start, but now dialed down to a hush and supported by a very fine, iris-tinted suede (or suedois) base. It is creamy and slightly sweet, with only trace amounts of the green amber, resinous myrrh, and sharp raspberry notes still apparent here and there.

Still, though – that awkward midsection…hmmmm. Given my fondness for lipstick fragrances, it’s possible that I could train myself away from my aversion to the heart notes. But it gives me pause for thought. I think Incarnata is a scary, massive lipstick up front, which is what I like about it, but it loses the plot after the topnotes fade away. Half the point about lipstick fragrances is that they’re supposed to be taken at face value – they are fun, beautiful in a simple, girlish way, and we are not supposed to try and make a more worthy scent out of them. Incarnata tries to inject a dose of salt and resin and beardy intellectualism into my beloved lipstick wax and it just ain’t happening. It’s a good fragrance alright, maybe too ambitious for the genre it’s shooting for. Ultimately, it’s just not to my personal taste.

L’Eau Scandaleuse

Wow – what a massive opening! L’Eau Scandaleuse barrels out of the bottle like an enraged bull, all gasoline-soaked tarpaulins and leather chaps a la Knize Ten, its power coming from a turbo-charged tuberose that smells like smoked, charred rubber. Fuel, rubber, leather, smoke – it’s all there, upfront, ready to knock you off your feet. It’s an impressive opening, making me think briefly of the opening to Lonestar Memories with its orangey creosote note and rubber-tire-on-a-fire accord.

But like with Lonestar Memories, L’Eau Scandaleuse loses all its interesting, smoky, ugly rubber bits – the bits that make it interesting – very quickly, collapsing into a pleasant orange blossom-driven leather with a musky tuberose support. I want more drama! More smoke! And for longer! Maybe I should just bite the bullet and buy Knize Ten or Lonestar Memories.

Later on, L’Eau Scandaleuse reminds me strongly of Tubereuse 3 by Histoires de Parfums, which I own and like, but have to be in the mood for. The rubbery leather chypre under-dressing continues to be interesting to me, because the rubber cuts the creaminess of the tuberose and the soapiness of the orange flower. To me, this small kernel of leather smells very much like the stiff brown coat leather (with mossy, coriander-leaf undertones) in my vintage Jolie Madame and Miss Balmain – that leaf-mulchy, murky brown-grey-green type of leather accord that feels stout and old-fashioned. It’s very 1970’s actually, and I like it. But – ack! Do you spot a common refrain here? L’Eau Scandaleuse reminds me too much of perfume that I already know and love. It’s beautiful but lacks the stinging slap of the new.

All in all, four very solid, even beautiful perfumes by Anatole Lebreton, with a classicizing bent and a respect for quality materials that is very evident. Everyone should test these, especially if you are someone who has seen what other non-classically trained perfumers have had to say in the past few years, such as Liz Moores of Papillon, and Hiram Green, and are excited to see what another talented, passionate perfume maker can add to that conversation.

Gourmand Immortelle Sandalwood Woods

Serge Lutens Jeux de Peau

18th December 2015

Serge Lutens Jeux de Peau smells – at first – like the air in a food product preparation lab, where the air swirls with all kinds of flavor molecules added to enhance our perception of what we’re actually eating.

I don’t think Jeux de Peau is foody per se (because it is not something that tempts me to eat it), but I do think it relies heavily on food aromachemical notes to produce it overall effect. I smell cylotene, a molecule that tastes of slightly burned maple syrup, bread, and coffee beans and is often added to real maple syrup to enhance the flavor/smell, and pyrazines, synthesized molecules responsible for the very intense smell of coffee, chocolate, woods, and bread brought to burning point under intense heat.

Like other pyrazine-rich perfumes, such as Aomassai, Un Bois Vanille, and Eau Noire, the effect in Jeux de Peau is intensely aromatic to the point where it can smell somewhat overcooked, or burned to a crisp, and like those other perfumes, a licorice or anise note has been added to underscore the deep “black” nuances.

The butyric undertone to the sandalwood is taken to the limits here, so it smells both richly oily and more than a little rancid, like a butter dish left out to fester under a hot lamp. When the toasted bread notes meet the buttery oilslick, the effect is unhealthy in that doughy, yeasty way that always reminds me of when a businessman slips off his loafers on a plane – that steamy odor of slightly-cooked feet pervading a closed-in space, always the same regardless of how spotless his socks, shoes, or feet actually are. The opening of Jeux de Peau forces that same unwanted intimacy on me, and I fight through it, gnashing my teeth until the intensity dissipates somewhat.

In the heart, the overly rich, stale butter notes are cut with a dash of salt, which I think is coming from a very herbal licorice or anise note, and the grassy, spicy tones of immortelle. The savory notes are perfectly balanced here by a delicious and delicate apricot jam accord (osmanthus flower), as well as the gentler milk tones coming out from the sandalwood. The sandalwood in this is just incredible – sweet and salty, richly, brownly aromatic, like an ancient elephant figurine carved from Mysore sandalwood held up to a fire to bring out the aroma hidden deep within its fibers.

Burned toast and butter, you say?

No, Jeux de Peau smells more complex than toast and butter. It also smells a lot less natural. The combined effect is a blur of intense flavor impressions that attract and repel at the same rate. I think it is high art. I am just not convinced that I want to wear it.

Gourmand Iris Leather Rose Suede

L’Artisan Parfumeur Traversee du Bosphore

4th December 2015

The first time I tried Traversee du Bosphore, I almost laughed out loud at how bad it was. There is a lurid, cherry-flavored Jolly Rancher note up top pitched halfway between children’s cough syrup and the clear pink goo you find at the bottom of a supermarket pie. I felt cheated. I had been promised a mystical Duchaufour-ian trawl through the back streets of Istanbul and what I got was cheap sweeties that even sugar-crazed five year olds might reject if they came spewing out of a piñata.

The notes say apple and pomegranate, two ingredients heavily used in Turkish and Balkan cuisine. But I am used to my mother-in-law’s wild pomegranate syrup, which is tart and sweet and tannic all at once, and I couldn’t see the connection to the more single-cell syrup I was smelling.

The dry down, on the other hand, was more interesting to me – a fat, pink suede cushion thickly dusted with icing sugar and trembling under the weight of rose petals. But every time I tried it, I had to clench my teeth through the artificial syrup opening. The main problem was that the opening notes felt cheap to me, and jarred against the uber expensive pink suede cube waiting for me in the dry down.

Then it struck me – what am I talking about? Lokum is cheap. It’s cheap to make, cheap to consume, and it tastes a bit cheap too. That’s practically the whole point of lokum. I used to live in the Balkans, and at meetings in Bosnia, Serbia, or Montenegro, someone would invariably pull out a tin of hilariously cheap lokum and you’d find yourself mindlessly chomping through two or three cubes of vaguely rose-flavored gelatin with the coffee – always more of a texture than a taste – careless of the post-lokum sugar headache that loomed over your medulla lungata like a nuclear cloud. Good stuff! Good times.

Knowing that lokum costs pennies is part of its hokey charm, I guess. It’s like coffee, good bread, and chocolate – small things that cost very little and yet provide so much pleasure to our daily lives. And this (essential) cheapness is key to appreciating Traversee du Bosphore. Enough with the mythologizing of Eastern sweetmeats, this perfume seems to be saying – lokum is made from boiled up horses’ hooves, and let’s not all pretend that it’s something fancier than it is.

I no longer live in the Balkans, so when I feel a bit nostalgic for the cheap rosewater taste of the local lokum, Traversee du Bosphore will have to stand in. Now that I have this scent pegged – a cheap and cheerful lokum suede – I can enjoy it without worrying about the cheap notes, which are, after all, exactly as they should be.