Aromatic Celebrity Incense Review Vetiver Woods

Sarah Jessica Parker Stash  

November 14, 2016
coffee-1030971_1280

I read somewhere that Sarah Jessica Parker wanted her new perfume to smell like contraband, hence the name Stash. But the first image that jumped to mind when I heard it was the abbreviation of “mustache” and the association has stuck. The mustache association turns out to suit the perfume perfectly – it’s as sexy and androgynous as a pretty girl dressed in drag for the night, fake mustache included.

Stash starts off as dry as a bone, with a bitter, peppery cedar dressed up with a sinus-clearing sage note. There’s a faintly watery-milky green note floating around in there that reminds me somewhat of the green violets in Santal 33 and the minty fig leaf in Santal Massoia, but the green note doesn’t direct any of the focus away from the dry, masculine woods. Add in some frankincense and what emerges is a creature in the same mold as Kyoto by Comme des Garcons – a stripped-down, minimalist cedar-incense with a tinge of something green and resinous.

My feelings about this are mixed. On the one hand, I think that Sarah Jessica Parker has succeeded in making a fragrance that is as anonymous and androgynous as Santal 33 and Kyoto – perfect for that low-key sexy vibe that Manhattanites go nuts for. It shares that same intimate, but at the same time oddly room-filling woody radiance that makes people wonder if you’re wearing perfume or if it’s just your skin and clothes that smell so good. The sage note, in particular, gives that witchy impression of a good, cleansing smoke-out to drive away djinns.

But the flip side of that premise is that Stash is a perfume that smells better at a distance than up close, on the skin. It’s a more of a scent of an ambiance – a gift to other people in your vicinity – than a pleasure for your own nose. None of the elements here truly work for me – I am unenthused about the bitterish cedar (mostly because in recent years, cedar has come to be synonymous with Iso E Super and Cedramber, even when the real stuff has been used, as here) and the dry sage, vetiver, and pepper make me think of dreary generic masculines.

I will give it this: somewhere in Stash’s development, all the dry, woody elements coalesce into a sweet, creamy finish that reads – at a distance – as sandalwood. Sometimes, days later, I catch a whiff of it on my sweaters and I fall in love with it. So I spray it again and am disgruntled, all over again, by the weak, bitter cedar and watery green notes that I find so bony and unsatisfying. Fast forward a few hours, and I am entranced by the creamy cloud that now surrounds my person. I smell warm, approachable, and ready for a hug.

In the end, I also struggle a bit with how to evaluate Stash fairly. It’s like talking about the smart kid who’s eons ahead of his classmates in Grade 1, but bump him ahead to Grade 3, and he struggles a bit. Stash is clearly head and shoulders above other celebrity perfumes – it is cool, sexy, androgynous, and not at all sugary or dumb. Bumping it up into the niche category, among whose brethren Stash really should be evaluated, and I find that it still holds up pretty nicely against similar stuff like Santal 33, Santal Massoia, Kyoto, and Tam Dao. It doesn’t stand out in that company. But it doesn’t fall too far behind either.

I’ve been wearing it a lot. It’s a perfect little thing for autumn – slip it on, forget all about it, and go kick over some leaves.

Price-wise, Stash is a much better deal than any of those androgynous, woody-incense perfumes in the niche category, and so I recommend it thoroughly to people who are into this type of scent but who want to achieve the same effect with less money. I paid €32 for a 30ml bottle, shipped over to me free from the UK Superdrug. I just found out that you can buy it in Boots, but you pay €45 for 30ml. God, people in the Republic of Ireland get completely shafted on price – better buy direct from the UK, if you can.

You Might Also Like

5 Comments

  • Reply Vic December 3, 2016 at 2:38 pm

    Interesting review, Claire. It definitely got me interested in trying Stash. I think Sarah Jessica Parker is one of the few celebrities that actually participates in creating her fragrances. Maybe this is why they are stand out among the sea of celebrity-endorsed perfumes. My favourite of her line is Lovely and even though it is feminine, I must admit I have worn it on several occasions.

  • Reply Samantha January 7, 2017 at 4:51 pm

    Hi Claire, I’ve just read your e-book on the Fragrance Daily and it was excellent. Great review of Stash too. I loved it, but I was still nodding in agreement with your stunning descriptions. I’m so glad I stumbled across your site! I’m going to immerse myself and have a good read!

    Sam

    • Reply Claire January 9, 2017 at 9:03 pm

      Thank you so much, Sam! :-) That is truly very nice of you. I am a regular reader of your blog too, by the way – I’m just shy about leaving comments on blogs. Nice to have you here anyway!

  • Reply Dante's Bra March 27, 2017 at 12:28 am

    I thought I was crazy for finding Stash so nauseating– it gets so much love, and I agree that it seems well-done for a celebuscent. Your review is spot-on: I think it’s the cedar that’s so nauseating, and it does smell better from a distance. I just can’t seem to get far enough away to like it!

    I found your blog via JTD of Scenthurdle. You’re both fantastic writers and your photos synthesize the ideas perfectly. Thank you.

    • Reply Claire March 27, 2017 at 9:54 am

      Thanks so much, Dante’s Bra….love the handle, by the way! Dante’s Bra is sheer genius :-)

    Leave a Reply